COMPETITIVE DISADVANTAGE
						It noted that the health sector, for example, "has 
						significant government involvement through direct 
						subsidy and regulation" with many charges provided 
						either free or with a co-payment a "fraction of the 
						total cost of providing the service". 
						
						Therefore, applying the GST to healthcare "would 
						place the private health sector, with its heavier 
						reliance on direct fees, at a competitive disadvantage 
						with the public health system". The same argument was 
						used to exclude education. 
						
						Mr Morrison said on Monday that health and 
						education we excluded for "very practical reasons" and 
						"those practical issues remain as challenging as they 
						were back then". 
						
						As The Australian Financial Review reported last month, 
						the federal Treasury has worked up GST options that were 
						presented to state treasures at their October 16 meeting 
						with Mr Morrison. These include a 15 per cent rate on 
						the current base, a 12.5 per cent rate on the current 
						base, and the two rates on expanded bases.
						Mr Morrison and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull are 
						insisting that any GST increase would be offset by tax 
						cuts elsewhere to ensure there would be no overall 
						increase in the tax take. 
						
						Mr Morrison said returning bracket creep was a priority, 
						while Mr Turnbull reassured voters there would be 
						adequate compensation to make sure those on welfare and 
						the low paid were no worse off in net terms. 
						
						"Any changes to the tax system have got to be ones that 
						ensure that there is no disadvantage to the most 
						vulnerable Australians, to less well-off Australians," 
						he said. 
						
						FAIRNESS SOUGHT 
						
						"We have to make absolutely clear that any changes to 
						the tax system or transfer payment system are ones that 
						are fair, that are seen to be fair across the board." 
						
						This indicates pension and other welfare top-ups along 
						with compensatory tax cuts. 
						
						However, the two states most amenable to an increased 
						GST, South Australia and NSW, reminded the government 
						that filling funding gaps in health and education were 
						the original priorities for increasing the tax. SA Labor 
						Premier Jay Weatherill pointed to the $80 billion 
						funding cut to the states for health and education in 
						the 2014 federal budget with the suggestion the states 
						think of alternative funding proposals. 
						
						This was seen as a push to garner support for an 
						increased GST and Mr Weatherill reiterated on Monday 
						that he was not going to stick his neck out just so the 
						revenue could instead be used to fund election-year tax 
						cuts for the federal government. 
						
						"You can't rip $80 billion from our budgets and then beg 
						some sort of tax measure to fix up the problem," he 
						said. 
						
						However, Mr Weatherill said both tax cuts and extra 
						funding for health and education could be provided if 
						the government looked at broadening the rate and base of 
						the GST, as well as looking at other measures, including 
						superannuation tax concessions. 
						
						"That gives you a broader canvass on which to work," he 
						said. 
						
						As well as super, the Premier urged a firmer hand 
						against multinational tax evaders, and placing the GST 
						on financial services, the latter of which would raise 
						up to $4 billion a year. 
						
						Mr Turnbull said on Monday that his preference was for 
						an election in September or October, which means could 
						be the centrepiece of the May budget. 
						
						Mr Weatherill 
						chipped his federal Labor counterparts, saying he had 
						yet to see from them a proposition that would fill the 
						funding gaps facing the states. 
						
						NSW Liberal Treasurer Gladys Berejiklian repeated her 
						support for a 15 per cent GST on the current base, 
						arguing this would provide enough to compensate those on 
						$100,000 and less and address the funding shortfalls. 
						
						"Our first priority remains addressing the looming 
						fiscal gap faced by all states and the commonwealth over 
						the next 20 years as a result of our growing health 
						funding needs," she said. 
						
						The government has not released the revenue estimates 
						from the GST scenarios Mr Morrison presented to the 
						states. KPMG has done some modelling which finds, for 
						example, that the current 10 per cent GST extended to 
						fresh food, health and education would raise an 
						additional $12.1 billion this financial year. 
						
						A 15 per cent GST based on current exemptions would 
						raise an additional $26.0 billion this financial year. 
						
						This would be enough to abolish insurance taxes, stamp 
						duty on motor vehicles and 80 per cent of conveyancing 
						stamp duty. 
						
						"Any remaining additional GST revenue is returned to 
						households through personal income tax cuts and welfare 
						payments," KPMG says. 
						
						Federal Nationals MP David Gillespie costed a New 
						Zealand-style model that would extend a 15 per cent GST 
						to health, education, fresh food and other exempt areas. 
						This would generate an extra $65.6 billion in 2017-18. 
						
						Mr Morrison thanked Mr Gillespie for his efforts but 
						said it was at "the pretty extreme end of the options 
						that you can technically consider". 
							
						
						
						Source::: 
						
						The Australian
						Financial Review, dated 02/11/2015.........